Content is slow to make
Teams struggle to write relevant, on-brand posts consistently — every post starts from a blank page.
Insite Plus is a concept for an AI social listening and publishing tool that helps European B2B companies create, schedule and measure LinkedIn content — and optimise the profiles behind it. It was a 2024 design assignment: I took it from research to high-fidelity UI on my own.

Design a social listening tool for B2B companies in Europe that want more from LinkedIn: content that’s easier to make, posts that go out at the right time, analytics that say what to do next, and profiles people actually find.
For B2B, LinkedIn is where decision-makers are. But teams juggle writing, scheduling and reporting across separate tools — and Europe isn’t one market: languages, local habits and GDPR all shape what works.
The brief named the pain clearly. Each one breaks a different step of a B2B team’s LinkedIn week.
Teams struggle to write relevant, on-brand posts consistently — every post starts from a blank page.
Posts go out when someone remembers, not when the audience is most likely to see them.
Engagement numbers arrive late and say what happened, not what to do next.
Company and personal profiles shape reach on LinkedIn, yet tools rarely help optimise them.
Create, schedule, measure and optimise in one product, so nothing falls between tools.
Let AI write the first draft and suggest timing — the marketer stays in control of what goes live.
Read the B2B and LinkedIn data, then audited Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Buffer and Agorapulse feature by feature.
Wrote three proto-personas for real European markets and turned the brief into flows and an information architecture.
Sketched the dashboard and post composer on paper, then built low-fidelity wireframes in Figma.
Designed sign-up, log-in, the dashboard and the AI post composer in high fidelity, with a type and colour system.
Before designing anything, I checked the brief against public data. These charts use published sources from the same period as the assignment.
Share of 980 B2B marketers worldwide, surveyed June–August 2024. Respondents could pick more than one.
| Platform | Share of B2B marketers |
|---|---|
| 85% | |
| 28% | |
| YouTube | 22% |
| 21% | |
| X (Twitter) | 7% |
| TikTok | 3% |
Average logged-in users per month, January–June 2024, in millions. EU total: 51.9M. The eight largest member states.
| Country | Logged-in users per month (millions) |
|---|---|
| France | 11.4M |
| Germany | 6.8M |
| Italy | 6.1M |
| Spain | 5.7M |
| Netherlands | 5.1M |
| Poland | 2.3M |
| Sweden | 2.1M |
| Belgium | 1.8M |
My own scoring from each product’s public features, 0–5. Insite Plus shows the design target, not a measured result.
| Capability | Insite Plus (design target) | Best of Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Buffer & Agorapulse |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn depth | 5 / 5 | 3 / 5 |
| AI content | 4 / 5 | 3 / 5 |
| Scheduling | 4 / 5 | 5 / 5 |
| Analytics | 4 / 5 | 5 / 5 |
| Profile optimisation | 5 / 5 | 1 / 5 |
| Ease of use | 4 / 5 | 5 / 5 |
The original brief leaned on AI content generation as the differentiator. The research said otherwise — and changed where the product had to win.
85% of B2B marketers say LinkedIn gives them the best value — three times the next platform. A LinkedIn-first tool is the right bet.
Buffer launched its AI Assistant in February 2023 and Hootsuite its OwlyWriter AI in April 2023. AI drafting alone wouldn’t set Insite Plus apart.
None of the tools I audited helped optimise the LinkedIn profiles that drive reach. That became the feature to lead with.
France, Germany and Italy alone account for almost half of LinkedIn’s EU users — each with its own language and rhythm, all under GDPR.
Proto-personas built from the brief and the research, placed in three of LinkedIn’s largest EU markets. They’re assumptions to validate, not interview findings.
Social Media Manager
Digital Marketing Manager
Content Strategist
“Insite Plus was an assignment, so there was no team to lean on. I owned the research, the structure and every screen.”
The main path through the product, and the four flows that matter most.
The two screens that carry most of the product, broken into their parts before any pixels.
The fastest way to test a layout is a pen. These sketches set the structure for the dashboard and the post composer.
Grey boxes first: hierarchy, spacing and flow, with colour and imagery held back until the layout worked.
A B2B marketer opens the tool to answer three questions: how are we doing, what’s going out next, and who are we reaching. The dashboard answers all three without a click.
The top band carries the headline numbers — posts published, engagements and audience growth, each against last month. Below, performance over time sits next to the calendar and upcoming posts, so results and plans are read together. The bottom row shows who the audience is and where they are.
Why this, not thatI put the calendar beside the performance chart instead of on its own page. Marketers plan next week from how this week went — seeing both together makes that one decision, not two.
Creating a post happens in a focused pop-up over the dashboard. Pick the platforms, add an image — upload one or generate it with AI — then write, or let AI write the first draft.
A live preview on the right shows the post as it will appear, and the word counter keeps it within limits. Date and time sit at the bottom, so a post goes from idea to scheduled in one place. Save as draft is always there for posts that aren’t ready.
Why this, not thatI kept the AI buttons next to the inputs they fill, not in a separate “AI” tab. The AI should feel like a faster way to do the same task — the marketer stays in charge of the words.
A social tool is about people, so the first screens lead with them. Sign-up and log-in pair a warm photo with a short, friendly headline and a simple form.
Social log-in with Google, Facebook and Apple sits under the form for teams that want to skip passwords, and the sign-up asks only for what the product needs to get started.
Why this, not thatI kept sign-up to one screen rather than a multi-step wizard. For a tool people try before they buy, every extra step before the dashboard is a reason to leave.
A friendly geometric sans that stays readable in dense analytics and still has character in headlines.
Plus Jakarta Sans
Open-source, geometric and highly legible at small sizes — with enough personality for a social product.
A deep purple carries the brand; the rest stays quiet so data and content lead.
Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Buffer and Agorapulse already did a lot. The design had to find the gap, not repeat the leaders.
By 2024 every major tool could draft a caption. The AI had to feel useful in context, not like a feature checkbox.
Different languages, posting habits and time zones across Europe — all under GDPR.
A dashboard with six kinds of information still had to read in seconds.
As an assignment, there was no live audience. I leaned on public data and clearly marked assumptions.
Research, structure and UI all had to come from one person, so the process had to stay disciplined.
The brief bet on AI content. The data showed AI was already everywhere — and pointed to profiles instead.
Proto-personas are useful as long as they’re labelled. The next step is always to test them with real people.
The paper dashboard set a grid that survived to high fidelity almost unchanged.
AI buttons beside the fields they fill feel like help. AI in its own corner feels like a demo.
A concept, not a launch.
But a well-researched one.
Insite Plus started as an assignment and became a lesson in letting research shape the product. Next, I’d validate the personas with interviews, test the composer with real B2B marketers, and design profile optimisation in full — the feature the research said nobody else had.