All work

LinkedIn for B2B teams, without the busywork — Insite Plus case study

Insite Plus is a concept for an AI social listening and publishing tool that helps European B2B companies create, schedule and measure LinkedIn content — and optimise the profiles behind it. It was a 2024 design assignment: I took it from research to high-fidelity UI on my own.

Type
Design assignment (2024)
Role
Product Designer — research to UI
Team
Just me
Market
B2B companies in Europe
Platform
Web app
Insite Plus — product screens
85%B2B marketers who say LinkedIn delivers the best value (CMI, 2024)
51.9MLogged-in LinkedIn users a month in the EU (Jan–Jun 2024)
4Competitors audited feature by feature
4Core screens taken from paper to high fidelity
01 Context

Where B2B brands actually grow

The brief

Design a social listening tool for B2B companies in Europe that want more from LinkedIn: content that’s easier to make, posts that go out at the right time, analytics that say what to do next, and profiles people actually find.

Why it matters

For B2B, LinkedIn is where decision-makers are. But teams juggle writing, scheduling and reporting across separate tools — and Europe isn’t one market: languages, local habits and GDPR all shape what works.

The dashboard — performance, calendar, upcoming posts and audience in one view (dummy data).
02 Starting point

Four problems in one workflow

The brief named the pain clearly. Each one breaks a different step of a B2B team’s LinkedIn week.

The problem

Content is slow to make

Teams struggle to write relevant, on-brand posts consistently — every post starts from a blank page.

The problem

Timing is guesswork

Posts go out when someone remembers, not when the audience is most likely to see them.

The problem

Analytics don’t lead anywhere

Engagement numbers arrive late and say what happened, not what to do next.

The gap

Profiles are an afterthought

Company and personal profiles shape reach on LinkedIn, yet tools rarely help optimise them.

Opportunity

One place for the whole week

Create, schedule, measure and optimise in one product, so nothing falls between tools.

Opportunity

AI that drafts, people who decide

Let AI write the first draft and suggest timing — the marketer stays in control of what goes live.

How the work ran

  1. Research

    Market and competitors

    Read the B2B and LinkedIn data, then audited Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Buffer and Agorapulse feature by feature.

  2. Define

    People and problems

    Wrote three proto-personas for real European markets and turned the brief into flows and an information architecture.

  3. Sketch

    Paper, then grey boxes

    Sketched the dashboard and post composer on paper, then built low-fidelity wireframes in Figma.

  4. Design

    High-fidelity UI

    Designed sign-up, log-in, the dashboard and the AI post composer in high fidelity, with a type and colour system.

03 Research · The market in numbers

Real data, not a hunch

Before designing anything, I checked the brief against public data. These charts use published sources from the same period as the assignment.

Which social platforms give B2B marketers the best value?

Share of 980 B2B marketers worldwide, surveyed June–August 2024. Respondents could pick more than one.

Which social platforms give B2B marketers the best value?
PlatformShare of B2B marketers
LinkedIn85%
Facebook28%
YouTube22%
Instagram21%
X (Twitter)7%
TikTok3%
Source: Content Marketing Institute, B2B Content Marketing Benchmarks, Budgets & Trends 2025 (opens in a new tab)

Where LinkedIn’s EU users are

Average logged-in users per month, January–June 2024, in millions. EU total: 51.9M. The eight largest member states.

Where LinkedIn’s EU users are
CountryLogged-in users per month (millions)
France11.4M
Germany6.8M
Italy6.1M
Spain5.7M
Netherlands5.1M
Poland2.3M
Sweden2.1M
Belgium1.8M
Source: LinkedIn, Digital Services Act Transparency Report (October 2024) (opens in a new tab)

Where the gap was: my feature audit (mid-2024)

My own scoring from each product’s public features, 0–5. Insite Plus shows the design target, not a measured result.

  • Insite Plus (design target)
  • Best of Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Buffer & Agorapulse
Where the gap was: my feature audit (mid-2024)
CapabilityInsite Plus (design target)Best of Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Buffer & Agorapulse
LinkedIn depth5 / 53 / 5
AI content4 / 53 / 5
Scheduling4 / 55 / 5
Analytics4 / 55 / 5
Profile optimisation5 / 51 / 5
Ease of use4 / 55 / 5
Source: My audit of public feature pages; AI writing launch dates from Buffer (Feb 2023) and Hootsuite (Apr 2023) announcements (opens in a new tab)
04 What I learned

AI writing was already table stakes

The original brief leaned on AI content generation as the differentiator. The research said otherwise — and changed where the product had to win.

Methods

  • Desk research: B2B and LinkedIn market data
  • Feature audit of Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Buffer and Agorapulse
  • Proto-personas for France, Germany and Italy
  • Planned next: online surveys, interviews and usability tests

Key insights

  1. LinkedIn is the B2B channel

    85% of B2B marketers say LinkedIn gives them the best value — three times the next platform. A LinkedIn-first tool is the right bet.

  2. Everyone already had AI

    Buffer launched its AI Assistant in February 2023 and Hootsuite its OwlyWriter AI in April 2023. AI drafting alone wouldn’t set Insite Plus apart.

  3. Profiles were the empty space

    None of the tools I audited helped optimise the LinkedIn profiles that drive reach. That became the feature to lead with.

  4. Europe is many markets

    France, Germany and Italy alone account for almost half of LinkedIn’s EU users — each with its own language and rhythm, all under GDPR.

05 Personas

Three people, three markets

Proto-personas built from the brief and the research, placed in three of LinkedIn’s largest EU markets. They’re assumptions to validate, not interview findings.

Anna Müller

Social Media Manager

Age
32
Location
Berlin, Germany
Company
Mid-sized tech company

Goals

  • Grow brand engagement on LinkedIn, X and Facebook
  • Streamline content creation and scheduling
  • Use analytics to improve campaigns

Pain points

  • Writing content takes too long
  • Hard to post at the best times
  • Analytics with few actionable insights

Pierre Dubois

Digital Marketing Manager

Age
45
Location
Paris, France
Company
Large financial institution

Goals

  • Make content more relevant on LinkedIn and Instagram
  • Coordinate and automate cross-platform campaigns
  • Make corporate profiles more visible

Pain points

  • Post performance varies across platforms
  • Too many accounts to manage
  • No built-in profile optimisation

Laura Rossi

Content Strategist

Age
25
Location
Milan, Italy
Company
Small healthcare start-up

Goals

  • Create content that reflects company values
  • Schedule posts for maximum reach on LinkedIn and X
  • Refine strategy from performance data

Pain points

  • Manual content creation is labour-intensive
  • No real-time engagement insights
  • Hard to keep one brand voice everywhere
06 My role

One designer, research to pixels

“Insite Plus was an assignment, so there was no team to lean on. I owned the research, the structure and every screen.”
  • Market research with public data
  • Competitor feature audit
  • Proto-personas and problem framing
  • User flows and information architecture
  • Paper sketches and low-fidelity wireframes
  • High-fidelity UI and a type system
Stage
Concept, design assignment
Users
B2B marketing teams in Europe
Year
2024
Team
Me
Tools
Figma, FigJam
07 User flow

From sign-up to a scheduled post

The main path through the product, and the four flows that matter most.

  1. Sign up / Log in
  2. Dashboard
  3. Create post
  4. Schedule
  5. Analytics
  6. Profile optimisation
  7. Settings & integrations
  8. Log out

Dashboard

Start
The user lands on the dashboard.
Actions
Reviews overall metrics, upcoming posts and quick actions.
Outcome
Decides what to do next — create a post, check analytics or optimise a profile.

Create a post

Start
The user selects “Create post”.
Actions
Picks platforms, gets an AI draft and image, then edits it to fit.
Outcome
A post that’s ready to schedule.

Schedule

Start
The user selects “Schedule post”.
Actions
Picks a date and time on the calendar, or accepts an AI-recommended time.
Outcome
The post is scheduled.

Optimise a profile

Start
The user selects “Optimise profile”.
Actions
Gets personalised recommendations and SEO suggestions for the profile.
Outcome
A more visible profile that supports every post.
08 Information architecture

What lives where

The two screens that carry most of the product, broken into their parts before any pixels.

Dashboard

  • Header
    • Search
    • Notifications
    • Profile and settings
  • Navigation
    • Content
    • Calendar
    • Analytics
    • Optimisation
  • Overview
    • Posts published
    • Engagements
    • Audience growth
  • Performance
    • Engagement over the last 30 days
    • Top posts
    • Audience by gender and location
  • Scheduled posts
    • Calendar
    • Upcoming posts
    • Create post

Create new post

  • Platforms
    • LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Instagram
  • Media
    • Upload an image
    • Generate an image with AI
  • Content
    • Write, or generate with AI
    • Word count (2,000 max)
  • Preview
    • Image and text as it will appear
  • Timing
    • Date
    • Time and time zone
  • Actions
    • Reset
    • Save as draft
    • Publish
09 Paper wireframes

Thinking on paper

The fastest way to test a layout is a pen. These sketches set the structure for the dashboard and the post composer.

10 Low-fidelity wireframes

Structure before style

Grey boxes first: hierarchy, spacing and flow, with colour and imagery held back until the layout worked.

11 Deep dive 1 · The daily view

One screen for the whole week

A B2B marketer opens the tool to answer three questions: how are we doing, what’s going out next, and who are we reaching. The dashboard answers all three without a click.

The top band carries the headline numbers — posts published, engagements and audience growth, each against last month. Below, performance over time sits next to the calendar and upcoming posts, so results and plans are read together. The bottom row shows who the audience is and where they are.

The problem

  • Writing, scheduling and reporting lived in separate tools.
  • Numbers said what happened, not what to do.
  • Plans and results were never on the same screen.

What I designed

  • Headline metrics with month-on-month change.
  • Performance beside the calendar and upcoming posts.
  • Audience by gender and geography at a glance.

Why this, not thatI put the calendar beside the performance chart instead of on its own page. Marketers plan next week from how this week went — seeing both together makes that one decision, not two.

The dashboard — results and plans read together (dummy data).
12 Deep dive 2 · AI that drafts

A blank page, never again

Creating a post happens in a focused pop-up over the dashboard. Pick the platforms, add an image — upload one or generate it with AI — then write, or let AI write the first draft.

A live preview on the right shows the post as it will appear, and the word counter keeps it within limits. Date and time sit at the bottom, so a post goes from idea to scheduled in one place. Save as draft is always there for posts that aren’t ready.

The problem

  • Every post started from a blank page.
  • No way to see a post as the audience would before it went out.
  • Writing and scheduling happened in different places.

What I designed

  • Platform choice, media and text in one composer.
  • AI for both the image and the text — always editable.
  • A live preview, a word counter and scheduling built in.

Why this, not thatI kept the AI buttons next to the inputs they fill, not in a separate “AI” tab. The AI should feel like a faster way to do the same task — the marketer stays in charge of the words.

The post composer — platforms, AI image and text, preview and scheduling in one place.
13 Deep dive 3 · First impressions

A front door that feels human

A social tool is about people, so the first screens lead with them. Sign-up and log-in pair a warm photo with a short, friendly headline and a simple form.

Social log-in with Google, Facebook and Apple sits under the form for teams that want to skip passwords, and the sign-up asks only for what the product needs to get started.

The problem

  • Long sign-up forms lose people before they start.
  • Generic, cold first screens for a people-centred product.

What I designed

  • Short forms with clear labels and required fields.
  • Social log-in with Google, Facebook and Apple.
  • A warm headline and photo that set the tone.

Why this, not thatI kept sign-up to one screen rather than a multi-step wizard. For a tool people try before they buy, every extra step before the dashboard is a reason to leave.

Log-in — a warm welcome and social sign-in.
Sign-up — only what’s needed to get started.
14 Typography

One typeface, many voices

A friendly geometric sans that stays readable in dense analytics and still has character in headlines.

Typeface

Plus Jakarta Sans

Open-source, geometric and highly legible at small sizes — with enough personality for a social product.

  • Display
    40px · 800
    Good Morning!
  • Heading
    28px · 700
    Performance Metrics
  • Title
    20px · 600
    Create New Post
  • Body
    16px · 400
    Track & manage your social media progress here.
  • Caption
    13px · 500
    Increased vs last month
15 Visual language

Confident, social, calm

A deep purple carries the brand; the rest stays quiet so data and content lead.

Colour
A deep brand purple for navigation, highlights and primary actions, on light neutrals — with red, green and blue reserved for data and status.
Typography
Plus Jakarta Sans throughout, from 40px display greetings to 13px captions.
Components
Stat cards with month-on-month change, charts with tooltips, a calendar with post dots, pill navigation and a focused pop-up composer.
Imagery
Real, diverse people on the front door; product screens stay clean and data-first.
16 Key challenges

What made this hard

A crowded market

Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Buffer and Agorapulse already did a lot. The design had to find the gap, not repeat the leaders.

AI was everywhere

By 2024 every major tool could draft a caption. The AI had to feel useful in context, not like a feature checkbox.

Many markets, one product

Different languages, posting habits and time zones across Europe — all under GDPR.

Dense data, calm screens

A dashboard with six kinds of information still had to read in seconds.

No users to test with

As an assignment, there was no live audience. I leaned on public data and clearly marked assumptions.

Designing alone

Research, structure and UI all had to come from one person, so the process had to stay disciplined.

17 Learnings

What Insite Plus taught me

  1. Check the brief against data

    The brief bet on AI content. The data showed AI was already everywhere — and pointed to profiles instead.

  2. Name your assumptions

    Proto-personas are useful as long as they’re labelled. The next step is always to test them with real people.

  3. Sketch before you polish

    The paper dashboard set a grid that survived to high fidelity almost unchanged.

  4. Put AI where the work is

    AI buttons beside the fields they fill feel like help. AI in its own corner feels like a demo.

A concept, not a launch.
But a well-researched one.

Insite Plus started as an assignment and became a lesson in letting research shape the product. Next, I’d validate the personas with interviews, test the composer with real B2B marketers, and design profile optimisation in full — the feature the research said nobody else had.